Is Daseke, Inc. a good value on the Nasdaq?

🛑 Daseke, Inc. wasn't a good value on 20th July

Daseke, Inc. hasn't performed well enough financially over the last 5 years.

We noticed something that, in our opinion, makes Daseke, Inc. a poor choice right now at any price.

Daseke, Inc. doesn't meet our expectations for good management

🛑 Cannot operate for a year without new income, which is below our comfort level.

🛑 Below our comfort level for covering day-to-day costs and bills.

🛑 Long-term financial cushion is below our comfort level.

🛑 Paying out too little of the expendable income to shareholders.

✅ Less than a year's worth of inventory is being held.

✅ Shareholders' earnings are coming from operations.

Daseke, Inc. doesn't meet our expectations for stable income

🛑 Income after taxes and debts is unreliable.

🛑 Expendable income per shareholder is unreliable.

🛑 Income actually returned to each shareholder is unreliable.

🛑 Shareholders earn less than 8% per year on their shares.

Should you buy this stock?
  • Whether you should invest in a particular company depends on many things, not only the company and its stock price
  • Do you have enough spare cash to invest? What else have you invested in? i.e., your personal financial situation
  • Best Value Shares.com does not know your personal financial situation, so it cannot and does not make recommendations for you to invest.
  • The information on this website is therefore only educational and informative.

🛑 Could Daseke, Inc. keep operations going in hard times?

🛑 Is Daseke, Inc. running with a comfortable buffer?

🛑 Is there something left for shareholders once all debts are repaid?

🛑 How big a buffer does the company have in returning cash to owners?

✅ How much inventory is Daseke, Inc. holding on to?

✅ What % of earnings come from operating activities?

🛑 Is Daseke, Inc. making money?

🛑 How much cash does the company generate per share?

🛑 How much cash does the company return to the owners, per share?

🛑 What return rate is the owner earning at?